{"infobox":{"dc_creator":"WooScraper_v1","dc_date_year":2006,"dc_identifier":"nl.oorg10123.2j.2006.343","dc_publisher":"oorg10123","dc_publisher_name":"Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu","dc_source":"https://www.rivm.nl/publicaties/reaction-to-re-in-response-to-correspondence-arising-from-twisk-and-proper-evaluation","dc_title":"Reaction to: \"Re: In response to the correspondence arising from Twisk and Proper: evaluation of the results of a randomized controlled trial: how to define changes between baseline and follow-up\" by Siew F.Chan and others [Letter to the editor] | RIVM","dc_type":"2j","dc_type_description":"2j - Onderzoek","foi_extraMetadata":{},"foi_files":[],"foi_isWoo":"Ja","foi_page_title":"Onderzoek Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu","foi_publishedDate":"2006-02-26","foi_retrievedDate":"2024-12-01","tooiwl_type":"c_fdaee95e"},"resource":"nl.oorg10123.2j.2006.343"}